Proof: npm test passed 164/164; npm run operator-dashboard:build passed; focused dashboard API client and UI static tests cover timeout, empty HTTP 500, and retry/error loading state.
Assumptions: The current stuck dashboard is caused by a stale or unavailable local kubectl port-forward; the app should fail visibly and allow retry instead of waiting forever.
Still fake: no public dashboard ingress is part of this turn; local dashboard access still depends on Kubernetes API/port-forward availability.
Proof: npm test; npm run operator-dashboard:build; PYTHONPATH=. python3 test/render_release_manifest_test.py; PYTHONPATH=. python3 test/repo_deployments_test.py
Assumptions: Kafka live topics carry normalized quote, decision, command, and execution result envelopes; durable quote outcomes still refresh through history/bootstrap when inventory attribution is recomputed.
Still fake: Venue-native terminal fill events and fee-complete realized PnL remain unavailable; submitted and relay-accepted evidence still cannot prove settlement without durable inventory movement.
Proof: Operator dashboard now starts from successful trades with linked outcome evidence, keeps submitted-only rows in awaiting/no-trade buckets, and explains why recent quotes are not proven asset-changing trades.
Assumptions: Until durable terminal outcome and settlement attribution are implemented, successful trade count must remain zero for submitted-only evidence.
Still fake: Per-quote terminal outcome and settled asset delta plumbing is still not implemented; the page now exposes that absence directly instead of hiding it behind submission counts.
Proof: Dashboard copy now describes durable submitted quote responses as submissions rather than successful trades or asset deltas, and regression coverage locks the new wording in place.
Assumptions: The current durable execution result still means quote-response submission, not settled execution or realized inventory change.
Still fake: The backend still stores and aggregates these rows under trade-oriented names, and the full quote lifecycle model is still the active follow-up turn.
Proof: Include the full operator-dashboard frontend source tree so the deployment image can build and serve the dashboard UI that consumes runtime health severity.
Assumptions: The current static dashboard source tree in the worktree is the intended frontend for this turn and belongs with the deployed operator-dashboard backend.
Still fake: External alert receiver remains unconfigured; this commit only resolves the dashboard asset source gap in the deploy.
